Free consultation · No fee unless we win · I come to you

Call or text (864) 777-1000
From Tom's desk · Rideshare crashes

Uber & Lyft Accidents in South Carolina: The App Decides Who Pays

Whether you were the passenger or the person the rideshare hit, the coverage available for your injuries turns on one fact: what the driver's app was doing at the moment of impact.

The First Question Isn't Who Ran the Light

In an ordinary crash, the first question is fault. In a rideshare crash, there's a question that comes even before that one: what was the app doing? Off, on-and-waiting, or on a ride — those three states carry three completely different insurance answers under South Carolina law, and the difference between two of them is roughly nine hundred thousand dollars of coverage.

South Carolina settled this by statute. The Transportation Network Company Act — the state's rideshare law — keys the required insurance to the app's status, not to the company's goodwill. That's genuinely useful for injured people: the coverage tiers are written into the code, so nobody has to take a rideshare company's word for what exists. But it also means these cases begin with a fact fight that ordinary crashes never have. This guide walks through the tiers, the two very different kinds of victims, why the cases stall, and — the part almost nobody writes about — how to pin down the app status with evidence before it goes stale.

The statute

South Carolina's Three App States — and What Each One Pays

Under S.C. Code § 58-23-1630, the required liability coverage steps up as the driver moves through the app:

App off: an ordinary crash

A rideshare driver with the app off is just a driver. Only their personal auto policy applies, and none of the rideshare layers exist. If that policy is state-minimum — the 25/50/25 floor I've explained in my guide to reading your own auto policy — then that's the starting picture, exactly as in any other wreck.

Logged on, waiting for a request: the middle tier

From the moment the driver logs on until a ride is accepted, the law requires primary liability coverage of at least $50,000 per person and $100,000 per incident for death and bodily injury, plus $50,000 for property damage — double the state minimums that apply to ordinary drivers — along with uninsured motorist coverage under § 38-77-150.

On a prearranged ride: the million-dollar tier

A "prearranged ride" begins when the driver accepts a requested ride and ends when the last rider leaves the vehicle — so it includes the drive to pick the passenger up. Throughout that window, the law requires primary liability coverage of at least $1,000,000 for death, bodily injury, and property damage, again with UM coverage alongside.

Two more provisions worth knowing, because they answer the "but what if" questions. The required coverage can be carried by the driver's policy, the company's policy, or both in combination. And if the driver's own insurance has lapsed or doesn't actually provide the required coverage, the statute puts the company's insurance on the hook from the first dollar of the claim, with a duty to defend it. The legislature anticipated the finger-pointing and wrote an answer into the law — which matters, because the finger-pointing happens anyway.

"Every client gets my personal cell number. Call or text me directly — you'll never chase a case manager."

Clients hear back from me the same day — and for emergencies, anytime.

— Thomas Spiro Conits

The warning in the statute

The Written Warning Nobody Reads

Buried in the same act is a provision that tells you everything about why these tiers exist: § 58-23-1635 requires rideshare companies to disclose to their drivers, in writing, that the driver's personal auto policy may not provide any coverage while they're logged on or carrying a passenger.

Think about what that means. The General Assembly was concerned enough about the gap between personal policies and app-on driving that it made the warning mandatory. Personal auto policies are priced for personal driving; carrying paying passengers is a different risk, and policies commonly exclude it. The statutory tiers exist to fill the hole that the warning describes.

If you're the injured person, this cuts in your favor: the law was built so that somebody's coverage applies at every stage of the app. If you're a driver — or someone in your household drives for an app — the warning is addressed to you, and my policy-reading guide tells you what to ask your insurer before this ever matters.

Two kinds of victims

Passenger in the Rideshare vs. Hit by the Rideshare

You were the passenger

A passenger on a requested ride is inside the million-dollar window by definition — the ride you booked is the prearranged ride. You're also, in almost every case, blameless: passengers rarely carry any percentage of fault, which under South Carolina's 51% rule makes yours the cleanest liability posture there is. If the other car caused the crash, that driver's liability coverage is in play too. The claim mechanics — and the strange guilt of claiming against a driver you rode with — work the same way as any passenger case, and I've written the full guide in injured as a passenger.

You were hit by the rideshare — driving, walking, or cycling

Now the tier question decides your ceiling. The same crash at the same intersection is worth pursuing against a $1,000,000 layer if the driver had accepted a ride, a 50/100/50 layer if they were waiting for one, and a possibly minimum personal policy if the app was off. You had no control over any of that — which is precisely why pinning down the app status (next section) is the first job in your case, not a detail for later.

In both postures, one more layer sits quietly behind everything: your own UM/UIM coverage, which travels with you into other people's cars and across crosswalks. When the applicable tier isn't enough for the injuries, your own policy can respond — the full mechanics are in my UM/UIM guide.

Why these cases stall

The Carrier Standoff: Why Rideshare Claims Move Slowly

A rideshare crash can put three or more insurance companies at one intersection: the driver's personal carrier, the policy covering the rideshare tiers, and the other driver's carrier — plus yours, if UM/UIM enters. Every one of them saves money if a different one pays. The predictable results:

  • The period fight. "Logged on" versus "logged off," "accepted" versus "waiting" — a few seconds of app data can move the coverage by an order of magnitude, so carriers dispute it.
  • The primacy fight. Even when the tier is clear, the personal carrier and the rideshare carrier can each insist the other is primary. The statute's first-dollar rule exists for exactly this, but invoking it takes someone on your side who knows it's there.
  • The waiting game. While carriers argue with each other, your bills arrive on schedule. What pays in the meantime — health insurance, MedPay, treatment on a letter of protection — is the machinery I've mapped in who pays the medical bills.

Meanwhile the clock doesn't pause: South Carolina generally gives you three years to file suit under § 15-3-530, and a standoff between carriers consumes that time in a way that only pressure — a demand, and if necessary a filed complaint — interrupts. One more caution: with multiple adjusters calling, the odds that one of them records a statement that hurts you multiply. My rule from the adjuster guide applies double here: be polite, be brief, and give no recorded statement before you've talked to a lawyer.

The part nobody writes

Pin the Period: The Evidence That Decides a Rideshare Case

Every article about rideshare crashes recites the coverage tiers. Almost none tell you how anyone proves which tier applies. The app status at the moment of impact is a fact, it lives in data, and the data is easiest to capture in the first days. Here's the checklist I actually work from.

If you were the passenger, your phone is the case file

  • Screenshot the trip while it's fresh: the receipt, the route map, the driver's name and photo, the vehicle and plate, and the pickup and drop-off times. Your ride receipt is third-party proof that a prearranged ride existed — most crash victims have nothing this good.
  • Report the crash inside the app as well as to police. The in-app report timestamps the incident in the company's own system.
  • Save the emails the app sends about the trip. Forward them somewhere safe; don't rely on the app's history screen staying the same.

If you were hit by the rideshare, you have to build what the passenger gets for free

  • At the scene: photograph the vehicle inside and out if it's safe to — a phone in a dash mount with an app open, a rideshare decal in the window, a passenger in the back seat. Ask the passenger for their name and number; the person whose receipt proves the period has no reason to hide it and every reason to help.
  • Tell the officer it was a rideshare so the report says so. A police report noting "driver stated he was operating for Uber" is the cheapest period evidence there is.
  • Get a preservation letter out fast. The definitive record — log-on times, ride acceptance, GPS trail — sits in the company's systems. A spoliation/preservation letter from a lawyer, sent early, demands that data be held. This is one of the first things I do in a rideshare case, usually the week I'm hired.

This is also the honest argument against waiting. Skid marks fade and witnesses scatter in every case — I've written about that on rural roads — but app data adds a second decay curve: accounts get deleted, phones get replaced, and retention policies run quietly in the background. The consultation is free, I come to you, and the fee is contingency — no fee unless we win. The earlier the preservation letter goes out, the less anyone has to argue about later.

If you can't come to me, I'll come to you.

I personally drive to clients' homes across Greenville and the surrounding counties — hospital rooms and kitchen tables included. You were just hurt; the last thing you need is a trip to a law office.

— Thomas Spiro Conits

Questions

Rideshare Accident FAQs

I was hurt as an Uber or Lyft passenger in South Carolina. What coverage applies?

If you were in the vehicle on a ride you requested, you were hurt during a "prearranged ride," and South Carolina law (S.C. Code § 58-23-1630) requires at least $1,000,000 in coverage for death, bodily injury, and property damage during that window, plus uninsured motorist coverage. If another driver caused the crash, that driver's liability policy is also in play. Passengers are almost never at fault, which makes these claims strong — the fight is usually over damages and which carrier pays, not over you.

What if the rideshare driver was logged in but waiting for a ride request?

That's the middle tier. While a driver is logged on the app but not yet on a prearranged ride, South Carolina requires at least $50,000 per person and $100,000 per incident for death and bodily injury, plus $50,000 for property damage, along with uninsured motorist coverage. It's real coverage, but a fraction of the million-dollar layer — which is exactly why insurers fight over which side of the ride-acceptance line the crash fell on.

What if the app was completely off?

Then it isn't a rideshare case at all — legally it's an ordinary car crash, and only the driver's personal auto policy applies. The rideshare layers exist only while the driver is logged on or engaged in a prearranged ride. That's why establishing the app's status at the moment of impact is the first task in every one of these cases, not an afterthought.

Does my own UM or UIM coverage apply on top of the rideshare coverage?

It can. Your own uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage travels with you — as a passenger in someone else's vehicle, a driver hit by a rideshare car, or a pedestrian. If the applicable rideshare-tier coverage or the at-fault driver's limits aren't enough for your injuries, your own UM/UIM can sit behind them. This is one more reason I read every policy in a client's household in these cases.

Do I sue Uber or Lyft, or the driver?

Usually the claim is made against the driver and paid through the insurance layers the law requires — the companies maintain that drivers are independent contractors and structure everything around that position. As a practical matter, the statutory insurance tiers exist precisely so injured people don't have to win that employment fight to be compensated. Which defendants and which policies belong in your case depends on the period, the fault picture, and the injuries — that's case-specific legal analysis, and it's what the free consultation is for.

Hurt in or by a rideshare? Pin the period before the data fades.

Free consultation. No fee unless we win. Tom reads the app evidence, sends the preservation letter, and deals with every carrier — while you heal.

Office: 100 Williams St, Greenville, SC 29601 · (864) 777-1000